MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 05935cam 2200853 i 4500
001 ocn948427430
003 OCoLC
005 20210126214703.0
008 160429s2016 oku b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2016020389
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dBTCTA$dBDX$dOCLCF$dYDXCP$dUCX$dGUB$dCLU$dCHVBK$dOCLCO$dOCLCA$dOCLCQ$dUKMGB$dOCLCA$dIGA$dNMS$dOCLCA$dNLVRD
016 7 $a018175145$2Uk
019 $a949865852$a965491421
020 $a9780806155654$q(hardcover ;$qalk. paper)
020 $a0806155655$q(hardcover ;$qalk. paper)
035 $a(OCoLC)948427430$z(OCoLC)949865852$z(OCoLC)965491421
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF8390$b.B35 2016
082 00 $a342.7308/72$223
100 1 $aBall, Dewi Ioan,$eauthor.
245 14 $aThe erosion of tribal power :$bthe Supreme Court's silent revolution /$cDewi Ioan Ball.
264 1 $aNorman, Oklahoma :$bUniversity of Oklahoma Press,$c[2016]
300 $aviii, 311 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 281-299) and index.
505 0 $aThe Tribes, Federal Indian Law, and the Indian sovereignty doctrine from the nineteenth Century to 1959 -- The foundations of the silent revolution, 1959-1973 -- The silent revolution, 1973-2001 -- Native America, Congress, and the silent revolution -- The effects of the silent revolution -- Native American "Nation Building" during the silent revolution.
520 $a"For the past 180 years, the inherent power of indigenous tribes to govern themselves has been a central tenet of federal Indian law. Despite the U.S. Supreme Court's repeated confirmation of Native sovereignty since the early 1830s, it has, in the past half-century, incrementally curtailed the power of tribes to govern non-Indians on Indian reservations. The result, Dewi Ioan Ball argues, has been a "silent revolution," mounted by particular justices so gradually and quietly that the significance of the Court's rulings has largely evaded public scrutiny. Ball begins his examination of the erosion of tribal sovereignty by reviewing the so-called Marshall trilogy, the three cases that established two fundamental principles: tribal sovereignty and the power of Congress to protect Indian tribes from the encroachment of state law. Neither the Supreme Court nor Congress has remained faithful to these principles, Ball shows. Beginning with Williams v. Lee, a 1959 case that highlighted the tenuous position of Native legal authority over reservation lands and their residents, Ball analyzes multiple key cases, demonstrating how the Supreme Court's decisions weakened the criminal, civil, and taxation authority of tribal nations. During an era when many tribes were strengthening their economies and preserving their cultural identities, the high court was undermining sovereignty. In Atkinson Trading Co. v. Shirley (2001) and Nevada v. Hicks (2001), for example, the Court all but obliterated tribal authority over non-Indians on Native land. By drawing on the private papers of Chief Justice Earl Warren and Justices Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Thurgood Marshall, William O. Douglas, Lewis F. Powell Jr., and Hugo L. Black, Ball offers crucial insight into federal Indian law from the perspective of the justices themselves. The Erosion of Tribal Power shines much-needed light on crucial changes to federal Indian law between 1959 and 2001 and discusses how tribes have dealt with the political and economic consequences of the Court's decisions."--Pub;isher's website.
610 10 $aUnited States.$bSupreme Court.
650 0 $aIndian reservations$zUnited States.
650 0 $aLand use$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States.
650 0 $aTribal government$zUnited States.
650 0 $aIndians of North America$xLegal status, laws, etc.
650 0 $aLand tenure$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States.
650 0 $aFederal-Indian trust relationship.
650 0 $aSelf-determination, National$zUnited States.
650 0 $aIndians of North America$xGovernment relations.
650 7 $aHISTORY / Modern / 20th Century.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aHISTORY / United States / 20th Century.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aLAW / Indigenous Peoples.$2bisacsh
610 17 $aUnited States.$bSupreme Court.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00529481
650 7 $aFederal-Indian trust relationship.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00922368
650 7 $aIndian reservations.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00969192
650 7 $aIndians of North America$xGovernment relations.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00969761
650 7 $aIndians of North America$xLegal status, laws, etc.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00969825
650 7 $aLand tenure$xLaw and legislation.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00991383
650 7 $aLand use$xLaw and legislation.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00991514
650 7 $aSelf-determination, National.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01111610
650 7 $aTribal government.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01156472
651 7 $aUnited States.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
610 17 $aUSA$bSupreme Court$2gnd
610 27 $aUmschulungswerkstätten für Siedler und Auswanderer$gBitterfeld$2gnd
650 7 $aIndianer$2gnd
650 7 $aRechtsstellung$2gnd
650 7 $aEntwicklung$2gnd
650 7 $aUnited States of America.$2pplt
650 7 $aSupreme court.$2pplt
650 7 $aIndians.$2pplt
650 7 $aLegal status.$2pplt
650 7 $aLand use.$2pplt
650 7 $aTraditional authority.$2pplt
650 7 $aSelf-determination.$2pplt
938 $aBrodart$bBROD$n116715030
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$nBK0018833242
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n12987985
029 1 $aCHBIS$b010912825
029 1 $aCHSLU$b001275908
029 1 $aCHVBK$b483514039
029 1 $aCHVBK$b48674681X
029 1 $aUKMGB$b018175145
994 $aZ0$bP4A
948 $hNO HOLDINGS IN P4A - 233 OTHER HOLDINGS