MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

LEADER: 03238cam a2200361 a 4500
001 012725559-1
005 20110810105230.0
008 101116s2011 vtu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2010048244
020 $a9781409427650 (hardback : alk. paper)
020 $a140942765X (hardback : alk. paper)
020 $a9781409427667 (ebook)
020 $a1409427668 (ebook)
035 0 $aocn682903914
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dYDXCP$dCDX$dBWK$dBWX$dWCL$dNDL$dMH-L
042 $apcc
050 00 $aK5018$b.B34 2011
082 00 $a345.001$222
100 1 $aBaker, Dennis J.
245 14 $aThe right not to be criminalized :$bdemarcating criminal law's authority /$cDennis J. Baker.
260 $aFarnham, Surrey, England ;$aBurlington, VT :$bAshgate,$cc2011.
300 $axi, 297 p. ;$c24 cm.
490 0 $aApplied legal philosophy
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [259]-284) and index.
505 0 $aUnprincipled criminalization -- The problem: unprincipled criminalization -- The right not to be criminalized -- The retributive foundations of individualized criminalization -- Principled criminalization -- The structure of this book -- Taking harm seriously as a fairness constraint -- Harm and wrongdoing -- Feinberg's account of objectively wrongful harm -- Wronging non-human animals -- Non-objective and objective conceptions of harm -- Constitutionalizing the harm principle -- Wrongful harm as a normative justification for penal detention -- Distinguishing criminal harm from private law harm: culpability and collective enforcement -- The moral dimensions of constitutional rights -- Harm as a constitutional requirement -- Can courts determine objective accounts of harm? -- Drawing the line -- The limits of remote harm and endangerment criminalization -- Criminal responsibility for the acts of another -- Empirical evidence of remote harmfulness --
505 0 $aFairly imputing aggregate harm to individuals -- Endangerment as a justification for criminalizing gun possession -- Conclusion -- The harm principle vs. Kantian criteria for ensuring fair criminalization -- Kantian criteria for ensuring fair criminalization -- Kant's second formulation of the categorical imperative -- Dan-Cohen and Ripstein's criticisms of the harm principle -- Harm and wrongdoing to non-humans -- Ripstein's sovereignty principle -- The moral limits of consent as a defense to criminal harm doing -- Objectivity and consent -- Harm and consent: stubborn counterexamples -- Objectivity and the limits of consent in R.V. Konzani -- Objectivity and wanton use of humans -- Other normative considerations -- Criminalizing harmless wrongs -- The hollowness of Feinberg's offense principle -- Feinberg's mediating maxims and critical morality -- The vacuity of moral realism as an explanation of criminalization's normativity -- Conventionally contingent harms --
505 0 $aThe normative badness of offense doing -- The wrongness of conventionally contingent bad acts -- Conclusion.
650 0 $aCriminal law$xPhilosophy.
650 0 $aLaw and ethics.
650 0 $aCriminal liability$xPhilosophy.
650 0 $aCriminal justice, Administration of$xMoral and ethical aspects.
988 $a20110324
906 $0DLC