| Record ID | harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.12.20150123.full.mrc:504215011:1876 |
| Source | harvard_bibliographic_metadata |
| Download Link | /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.12.20150123.full.mrc:504215011:1876?format=raw |
LEADER: 01876cam a2200385 a 4500
001 012642646-5
005 20120608025057.0
008 101208s2010 dcu b f000 0 eng c
020 $a9780160871382
020 $a0160871387
035 0 $aocn743436163
035 0 $aocn690667749
037 $a552-070-41983-7$bGPO
040 $aGPO$cGPO$dGPO
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 14 $aKF27$b.J8568 2009k
074 $a1020-A
086 0 $aY 4.J 89/1:111-118
088 $aSerial no. 111-118 (United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary)
110 1 $aUnited States.$bCongress.$bHouse.$bCommittee on the Judiciary.$bSubcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy.
245 10 $aExamining the state of judicial recusals after Caperton v. A.T. Massey :$bhearing before the Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, December 10, 2009.
260 $aWashington :$bU.S. G.P.O. :$bFor sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.,$c2010.
300 $aiii, 227 p. ;$c24 cm.
500 $aShipping list no.: 2011-0081-P.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
500 $a"Serial no. 111-118."
505 2 $aLetter: new court rules may let minority win -- Commentary: beware power grab for Michigan court.
650 0 $aJudges$xRecusal$zUnited States.
650 0 $aJudges$xDisqualification$zUnited States.
650 0 $aCourts$xOfficials and employees$xProfessional ethics$zUnited States.
650 0 $aConflict of interests$zUnited States.
776 08 $iOnline version:$aUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy.$tExamining the state of judicial recusals after Caperton v. A.T. Massey$hiii, 227 p.$w(OCoLC)690673104
988 $a20101217
906 $0OCLC