It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

Record ID harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.11.20150123.full.mrc:300895623:2646
Source harvard_bibliographic_metadata
Download Link /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.11.20150123.full.mrc:300895623:2646?format=raw

LEADER: 02646cam a2200349 a 4500
001 011357867-9
005 20080109123021.0
008 071204s2007 pau b f000 0 eng c
020 $a1584873272
020 $a9781584873273
035 0 $aocn182756896
040 $aAWC$cAWC$dGPO$dAFQ
042 $apcc
043 $ae-ur---
050 4 $aDK510.763$b.R835 2007
245 00 $aRussian security strategy under Putin:$bU.S. and Russian perspectives.
260 $aCarlisle, PA :$bStrategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College,$c[2007]
300 $av, 49 p. ;$c23 cm.
440 0 $aGlobal security challenges to U.S. interests
500 $a"November 2007."
500 $a"The two papers grouped together here were delivered at the Strategic Studies Institute's annual strategy conference for 2007" -- Foreword.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
505 0 $aU.S. interests in the new Eurasia / R. Craig Nation -- Russia's threat perception and strategic posture / Dmitri Trenin.
520 $a"Increasingly, the armed forces and a vision of security as emphasizing hard rather than soft security have come to the fore in Moscow's national security policy process. Due to this institutionally-driven vision, Russia sees itself facing increasing military-political and strategic threats all along its frontiers. Recent Russian policies reflect that perception and Moscow's adaptation to it. We may think this threat perception to be misguided, even bizarrely misconceived, given our own beliefs about what American policy is and what its goals are. Nevertheless, the strongest forces in the Russian policy community have bought into that vision and have made policy accordingly. Therefore, the key point that readers should take as they read these papers together is that Russian and American perspectives and policies are mutually interactive. They do not take place in a strategic vacuum devoid of all context, and develop to a considerable degree in response to the other side's activities and rhetoric. Neither we nor Russia can act in disregard of the fact that our actions have consequences and that other state actors in Eurasia, as elsewhere, also have a vote in shaping the context of international affairs and in the day-to-day conduct of U.S. and Russian national security policy" -- p. v.
651 0 $aRussia (Federation)$xForeign relations.
651 0 $aRussia (Federation)$xStrategic aspects.
650 0 $aGeopolitics$zEurasia.
700 1 $aNation, R. Craig.
700 1 $aTrenin, Dmitriĭ.
710 2 $aArmy War College (U.S.).$bStrategic Studies Institute.
988 $a20080109
906 $0OCLC