Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
In this wide-ranging and original book, James C. Scott analyzes failed cases of large-scale authoritarian plans in a variety of fields. He argues that centrally managed social plans derail when they impose schematic visions that do violence to complex interdependencies that are not - and cannot be - fully understood. Further the success of designs for social organization depends on the recognition that local, practical knowledge is as important as formal, epistemic knowledge.
The author builds a persuasive case against "development theory" and imperialistic state planning that disregards the values, desires, and objections of its subjects.
And in discussing these planning disasters, he identifies four conditions common to them all: the state's attempt to impose administrative order on nature and society; a high-modernist ideology that believes scientific intervention can improve every aspect of human life; a willingness to use authoritarian state power to effect large-scale innovations; and a prostrate civil society that cannot effectively resist such plans.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Previews available in: English
Subjects
People
Places
Showing 2 featured editions. View all 13 editions?
| Edition | Availability |
|---|---|
|
1
Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (The Institution for Social and Policy St)
February 8, 1999, Yale University Press
Paperback
in English
- New Ed edition
0300078153 9780300078152
|
eeee
|
|
2
Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed
1998, Yale University Press
in English
0300070160 9780300070163
|
aaaa
|
Book Details
First Sentence
"Certain forms of knowledge and control require a narrowing of vision."
Table of Contents
Edition Notes
Includes bibliographical references (p. 359-434) and index.
Classifications
The Physical Object
Edition Identifiers
Work Identifiers
Source records
Work Description
Examines how (sometimes quasi-) authoritarian central planning fails to deliver the goods, be they increased resources for the state or a better life for the people.


