Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Publisher description "Has globalization diluted the power of national governments to regulate their own economies? Are international governmental and nongovernmental organizations weakening the hold of nation-states on global regulatory agendas? Many observers think so. But in All Politics Is Global, Daniel Drezner argues that this view is wrong. Despite globalization, states especially the great powers still dominate international regulatory regimes, and the regulatory goals of states are driven by their domestic interests. As Drezner shows, state size still matters. The great powers the United States and the European Union remain the key players in writing global regulations, and their power is due to the size of their internal economic markets. If they agree, there will be effective global governance. If they don't agree, governance will be fragmented or ineffective. And, paradoxically, the most powerful sources of great-power preferences are the least globalized elements of their economies. Testing this revisionist model of global regulatory governance on an unusually wide variety of cases, including the Internet, finance, genetically modified organisms, and intellectual property rights, Drezner shows why there is such disparity in the strength of international regulations." (http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0704/2006017741-d.html).
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Subjects
| Edition | Availability |
|---|---|
|
1
All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes
2008, Princeton University Press
in English
1400828635 9781400828630
|
zzzz
|
|
2
All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes
March 15, 2007, Princeton University Press
Hardcover
in English
0691096414 9780691096414
|
aaaa
|
Book Details
First Sentence
"GLOBALIZATION IS RESPONSIBLE for a lot of bad international relations theory."
Classifications
The Physical Object
Edition Identifiers
Work Identifiers
Source records
First Sentence
"GLOBALIZATION IS RESPONSIBLE for a lot of bad international relations theory."

