On Naval Timber and Arboriculture: With Critical Notes on Authors who Have Recently Treated the ...
Bookreader Item Preview
Share or Embed This Item
texts
On Naval Timber and Arboriculture: With Critical Notes on Authors who Have Recently Treated the ...
- Publication date
- 1831
- Publisher
- Longman ...
- Collection
- americana
- Book from the collections of
- Harvard University
- Language
- English
Book digitized by Google from the library of Harvard University and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb.
Notes
"Theory and natural selection prior to Darwin's publication, propounded in Appendix: p. 364-388"--NUC cited below.
- Addeddate
- 2008-07-13 08:01:04
- Copyright-region
- US
- Identifier
- onnavaltimberan01mattgoog
- Identifier-ark
- ark:/13960/t74t6r89j
- Openlibrary_edition
- OL20504145M
- Openlibrary_work
- OL13143398W
- Pages
- 421
- Possible copyright status
- NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT
- Scandate
- 20070613000000
- Scanner
- Worldcat (source edition)
- 26697469
- Year
- 1831
comment
Reviews
Reviewer:
jfderry
-
-
April 16, 2018
Subject: Update: Fabrication / Falsification / Deceit / Personation (Sock Puppetry)
Subject: Update: Fabrication / Falsification / Deceit / Personation (Sock Puppetry)
The collections team representative for the Internet Archive has been asked to remove Sutton's review as all it is doing is advertising his flawed book, and it would be good for people not to send a fraudster like Sutton their money. The Internet Archive has decided to ignore theses pleas, so here is a warning placeholder to let you know that Sutton is making fraudulent claims.
__________________________________________________
UPDATE:
Sutton in peer review___ https://pubpeer.com/publications/C3BFC392DF4B02676F80CF149857DB# ____________________________________________________
SUTTON WOO https://mrsuttonntu.wordpress.com/
____________________________________________________
Natural Histories https://historiesofecology.blogspot.co.uk/
____________________________________________________
Alfred Russel Wallace http://wallacefund.info/content/did-patrick-matthew-independently-discover-natural-selection
____________________________________________________
PM PROJECT https://patrickmatthewproject.wordpress.com/opinions/matthews-influence/darwins-lies/
____________________________________________________
Mike Sutton, an academic in Nottingham, has fabricated and falsified evidence, to claim Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace stole the idea that evolution by natural selection can produce new species of plants and animals. His series of publications has evaded peer review, and should never have been published, but they were and now they’re feeding falsehoods into the scientific literature. Sutton has been misleading the public, including lying to Perthshire primary school children, and providing the means to defraud the Heritage Lottery Fund.
____________________________________________________
Sutton has been shown to be incompetent, vindictive, and ignorant. He does not follow academic protocol, and uses sock puppetry to promote himself, and falsely defame others. Refusing to debate, he regularly abuses the reputations of notable scientists, living and dead, and maligns all refuters. His editors and employer university refuse to act ethically; he should be investigated for misconduct, and his papers retracted. Instead, he has been allowed to continue, while his works are being cited, also making this a matter of protecting the scientific literature. More people need to be made aware that such a loophole exists, in a system reliant on trust; authorities and publishers need to be reminded of their ethical duty in protecting the historic record.
____________________________________________________
Sutton knows that experts from the fields of science history and evolutionary biology have comprehensively refuted his assertions (see links below). Not only this, but almost every claim regarding myth busting (upon which he prides himself) is also invalid, falsified by his poor and lazy research. His data is often erroneous because of faulty collection, which is astonishing, when his facile response to the truism that "nothing in science is 100%", was to make a imbecilic show of the certainty of seeing words on a page. Words are just groups of symbols without meaning, and that is where Sutton also fails, in applying logical interpretation. Instead of engaging with the subject like a responsible academic, he runs and hides behind his dean of school, the committee of the local heritage group he has conned, and his family. He is a disgrace to his profession. His response to any challenge is usually that there is a conspiracy that has been operating in evolutionary biology, to maintain Darwin's place since 1860. That anyone interested in Darwin wishes to maintain their livelihood (if you have ever seen the process involved in applying for research funding, you'd know how irrelevant his statement). Furthermore, because he made a direct personal accusation, I can state that any writing of mine on Darwin has only ever been outside any contractual position - easily checked, look at the acknowledgements where funding bodies ought to be mentioned. Plus, I was not on a salary or contract or any other form of income prior to his initial attacks, and have not been in the two years spent investigating him since. He calls people, followers, or supporters. Science is not a sports club. You form conclusions, and do not sign petitions and buy souvenirs. Bloody idiot. See for yourselves, what a complete failure he really is,
Sutton Woo
https://mrsuttonntu.wordpress.com/
Natural Histories
https://historiesofecology.blogspot.co.uk/
Patrick Matthew Project (PMP)
https://patrickmatthewproject.wordpress.com/
Alfred Russel Wallace Website
http://wallacefund.info/content/did-patrick-matthew-independently-discover-natural-selection
JF Derry
Edinburgh
__________________________________________________
UPDATE:
Sutton in peer review___ https://pubpeer.com/publications/C3BFC392DF4B02676F80CF149857DB# ____________________________________________________
SUTTON WOO https://mrsuttonntu.wordpress.com/
____________________________________________________
Natural Histories https://historiesofecology.blogspot.co.uk/
____________________________________________________
Alfred Russel Wallace http://wallacefund.info/content/did-patrick-matthew-independently-discover-natural-selection
____________________________________________________
PM PROJECT https://patrickmatthewproject.wordpress.com/opinions/matthews-influence/darwins-lies/
____________________________________________________
Mike Sutton, an academic in Nottingham, has fabricated and falsified evidence, to claim Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace stole the idea that evolution by natural selection can produce new species of plants and animals. His series of publications has evaded peer review, and should never have been published, but they were and now they’re feeding falsehoods into the scientific literature. Sutton has been misleading the public, including lying to Perthshire primary school children, and providing the means to defraud the Heritage Lottery Fund.
____________________________________________________
Sutton has been shown to be incompetent, vindictive, and ignorant. He does not follow academic protocol, and uses sock puppetry to promote himself, and falsely defame others. Refusing to debate, he regularly abuses the reputations of notable scientists, living and dead, and maligns all refuters. His editors and employer university refuse to act ethically; he should be investigated for misconduct, and his papers retracted. Instead, he has been allowed to continue, while his works are being cited, also making this a matter of protecting the scientific literature. More people need to be made aware that such a loophole exists, in a system reliant on trust; authorities and publishers need to be reminded of their ethical duty in protecting the historic record.
____________________________________________________
Sutton knows that experts from the fields of science history and evolutionary biology have comprehensively refuted his assertions (see links below). Not only this, but almost every claim regarding myth busting (upon which he prides himself) is also invalid, falsified by his poor and lazy research. His data is often erroneous because of faulty collection, which is astonishing, when his facile response to the truism that "nothing in science is 100%", was to make a imbecilic show of the certainty of seeing words on a page. Words are just groups of symbols without meaning, and that is where Sutton also fails, in applying logical interpretation. Instead of engaging with the subject like a responsible academic, he runs and hides behind his dean of school, the committee of the local heritage group he has conned, and his family. He is a disgrace to his profession. His response to any challenge is usually that there is a conspiracy that has been operating in evolutionary biology, to maintain Darwin's place since 1860. That anyone interested in Darwin wishes to maintain their livelihood (if you have ever seen the process involved in applying for research funding, you'd know how irrelevant his statement). Furthermore, because he made a direct personal accusation, I can state that any writing of mine on Darwin has only ever been outside any contractual position - easily checked, look at the acknowledgements where funding bodies ought to be mentioned. Plus, I was not on a salary or contract or any other form of income prior to his initial attacks, and have not been in the two years spent investigating him since. He calls people, followers, or supporters. Science is not a sports club. You form conclusions, and do not sign petitions and buy souvenirs. Bloody idiot. See for yourselves, what a complete failure he really is,
Sutton Woo
https://mrsuttonntu.wordpress.com/
Natural Histories
https://historiesofecology.blogspot.co.uk/
Patrick Matthew Project (PMP)
https://patrickmatthewproject.wordpress.com/
Alfred Russel Wallace Website
http://wallacefund.info/content/did-patrick-matthew-independently-discover-natural-selection
JF Derry
Edinburgh
Reviewer:
De Mike Sutton
-
favoritefavoritefavoritefavoritefavorite -
August 12, 2014
Subject: The only independent discovery of natural selection
Subject: The only independent discovery of natural selection
Darwin and Wallace both plagiarized this book and then lied when they claimed no prior knowledge of it. See 'Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret' for a wealth of unique evidence as to whom Darwin and Wallace both knew who actually can be proven to have read it, because they cited it in the literature! So what were Darwin and Wallace, were they Schnooks or Crooks? Matthew is an immortal great thinker in science. Darwin and Wallace are both science swindlers. Darwinists are members of a biased adoration cult that refuses to engage with the newly discovered hard facts. Oh yes and I forgot to mention that 'Nullius in Verba' proves fraud by way of plagiarism detection of Darwin's and Wallace's published and unpublished work compared with Matthew's On Naval Timber. Moreover, Darwin told six lies to achieve primacy of Matthew and every one of the eight excuses he fabricated as to why he supposedly never read Matthew's book is uniquely proven to be fallacious. Natural selection was discovered by a Scottish forester. There is now only one proven independent discoverer of natural selection. His name is Patrick Matthew and he published his discovery of the most important theory in science in this book 27 years before Darwin and Wallace copied it each committed the greatest science fraud in the history of science fraud by pretending it was their own independent discovery.
1,409 Views
3 Favorites
DOWNLOAD OPTIONS
For users with print-disabilities
IN COLLECTIONS
American LibrariesUploaded by Unknown on