Domestic Refuse: Cause, Consequence and Cost

An investigation into the effectiveness of current and proposed recycling schemes for domestic refuse with regard to the economic, social and technological factors involved.

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
Domestic Refuse: Cause, Consequence and Cost
Keith White-Hunt
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Buy this book

July 19, 2014 | History

Domestic Refuse: Cause, Consequence and Cost

An investigation into the effectiveness of current and proposed recycling schemes for domestic refuse with regard to the economic, social and technological factors involved.

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Abstract.

All local Government Authorities in the United Kingdom are required to collect and dispose of Domestic refuse. About 15 million tons are collected annually, about 90% of which is tipped and covered over: most of the remainder being incinerated (a small amount – less than ½ % - being composted).

Although the former method of disposal often serves a useful purpose in that material is provided for landfill operations, present trends would seem to indicate that this is an extravagant use of such a potentially valuable commodity. Similarly with incineration; few plants have provision for recovering the heat produced during combustion or for reclaiming the valuable materials in the incinerator feed or discharge.

There is a possibility that if present trends in consumption (qualitatively as well as quantitatively) continue, readily recoverable stocks of those materials which are at present necessary to the industrially-based mode of life of most countries will become unavailable to them. Yet, this research reveals that: despite a huge import bill for metals, over a million tons of metal are discharged in Domestic Refuse every year in the UK alone; the Nation’s bill for imported wood pulp is over £200 million, yet waste-paper with a potential value of about £50 million is buried or burned alongside other household ‘rubbish’; and while over 2 million tonnes of fertilizer are imported annually at a cost of nearly £17 million, at the same time about 2½ million tonnes of vegetable and putrescible material – which could possibly be composted and returned to the land – are thrown away as household waste. Further, most of the Local Authorities which burn household refuse do not recover the heat evolved yet crude oil imports alone incurred a massive bill, to be settled by the Country, of £1,338 million in 1973.

The detail of the research is principally concerned with those problems connected with Domestic Refuse today and how these could better be approached – in particular, the more widespread adoption of recycling and the economic, social and technological factors involved with its achievement. However, as these factors are only a part of the general overall problem, they are necessarily presented in this wider context: the effects of economic and industrial development upon the social and physical environment; growth-based on the “indiscriminate” use of finite natural resources; the creation of waste and the present trend of expanding output through ‘planned obsolescence’ and ‘artificial stimuli’. Therefore, a consideration of policy issues which touch on this subject are also addressed. For the sake of completeness, the research also includes a brief history of domestic refuse.

Publish Date
Language
English

Buy this book

Book Details


Published in

Bradford, United Kingdom

Edition Notes

M.Sc. thesis.

Series
Theses

The Physical Object

Pagination
2 vols

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL21505099M

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
July 19, 2014 Edited by Professor Keith White-Hunt Edited without comment.
December 15, 2009 Edited by WorkBot link works
November 2, 2008 Created by ImportBot Imported from Talis MARC record.